<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ethereal Nature</title>
	<link>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5688</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5688</guid>
		<description>Wow, I love the design, I think the chiffon and the soft color saves the design because it's on the edge between kitch or class. Just my opinion... (but I still like it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I love the design, I think the chiffon and the soft color saves the design because it&#8217;s on the edge between kitch or class. Just my opinion&#8230; (but I still like it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marina urbach</title>
		<link>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5666</link>
		<dc:creator>marina urbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5666</guid>
		<description>' I love the knotting of the “roses” on the front of dress.'

Perhaps a bit kitsch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216; I love the knotting of the “roses” on the front of dress.&#8217;</p>
<p>Perhaps a bit kitsch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lily</title>
		<link>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5627</link>
		<dc:creator>Lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 22:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5627</guid>
		<description>Exquisite, but the zipper should have been more skillfully hidden; it mars the pleating and the stitching seems clumsy.  I love the knotting of the "roses" on the front of dress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exquisite, but the zipper should have been more skillfully hidden; it mars the pleating and the stitching seems clumsy.  I love the knotting of the &#8220;roses&#8221; on the front of dress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pet</title>
		<link>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5622</link>
		<dc:creator>Pet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5622</guid>
		<description>My wife would love to be in this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife would love to be in this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landon Jones</title>
		<link>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5621</link>
		<dc:creator>Landon Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5621</guid>
		<description>Loved this dress again at the Met via the blog.mode exhibit! Landon - you sure maximize your membership association witht the museum.

Best,

LJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved this dress again at the Met via the blog.mode exhibit! Landon - you sure maximize your membership association witht the museum.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>LJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita</title>
		<link>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5540</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5540</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you Marina and Laurie, Kate and Laura are very talented.

But unlike Andy, I don't think they are to young to be in the MET.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you Marina and Laurie, Kate and Laura are very talented.</p>
<p>But unlike Andy, I don&#8217;t think they are to young to be in the MET.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Aron</title>
		<link>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5423</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Aron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5423</guid>
		<description>I was going to say that with all that intensive dressmaker construction and attention to detail, this dress seems to bloom so naturally, yet Marina, what an astute remark...""a construction of great beauty, but a beauty that lacks the reflective dimension of the 'shipwreck' drama of McQueen, or the irony of the Kurihara's juxtaposition."

That is absolutely true of this dress, which though haute couture at its technical heart, it is also basically conservative in form. I think the current Rodarte collection pushes the envelope much more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say that with all that intensive dressmaker construction and attention to detail, this dress seems to bloom so naturally, yet Marina, what an astute remark&#8230;&#8221;"a construction of great beauty, but a beauty that lacks the reflective dimension of the &#8217;shipwreck&#8217; drama of McQueen, or the irony of the Kurihara&#8217;s juxtaposition.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is absolutely true of this dress, which though haute couture at its technical heart, it is also basically conservative in form. I think the current Rodarte collection pushes the envelope much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabby</title>
		<link>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5389</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5389</guid>
		<description>it looks just like a water fall! doesn't anyone agree with me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it looks just like a water fall! doesn&#8217;t anyone agree with me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aunt Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5387</link>
		<dc:creator>Aunt Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5387</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to reach out and touch this.  How good it must feel to wear -- the fabric floating off the body, the ruffles and flower details.  Ultimately feminine yet also ultimately natural like wearing a leaf or a flower.  

Idea -- what if you had a sample of the fabric we could touch outside the glass enclosure.  I love the feel of fabric and I miss being able to do that with these clothes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to reach out and touch this.  How good it must feel to wear &#8212; the fabric floating off the body, the ruffles and flower details.  Ultimately feminine yet also ultimately natural like wearing a leaf or a flower.  </p>
<p>Idea &#8212; what if you had a sample of the fabric we could touch outside the glass enclosure.  I love the feel of fabric and I miss being able to do that with these clothes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marina urbach</title>
		<link>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5369</link>
		<dc:creator>marina urbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 06:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.metmuseum.org/blogmode/2008/04/05/ethereal-nature/#comment-5369</guid>
		<description>It is tempting to compare this piece of the Mulleavy sisters to
the 'Paper Doll' of Tao Kurihara, or Alexander McQueen’s 
'Oyster Dress'.
'Our work is often a study of balance, in which volume, construction, and color have a complex interplay that we carefully control.'
Control is a key concept for the work of the Mulleavy sisters:
delicate constructed balance, subtle tonal texture, fluid ethereality,
a construction of great beauty, but a beauty that lacks the reflective dimension of the 'shipwreck' drama of
McQueen, or the irony of Kurihara's juxtaposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is tempting to compare this piece of the Mulleavy sisters to<br />
the &#8216;Paper Doll&#8217; of Tao Kurihara, or Alexander McQueen’s<br />
&#8216;Oyster Dress&#8217;.<br />
&#8216;Our work is often a study of balance, in which volume, construction, and color have a complex interplay that we carefully control.&#8217;<br />
Control is a key concept for the work of the Mulleavy sisters:<br />
delicate constructed balance, subtle tonal texture, fluid ethereality,<br />
a construction of great beauty, but a beauty that lacks the reflective dimension of the &#8217;shipwreck&#8217; drama of<br />
McQueen, or the irony of Kurihara&#8217;s juxtaposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
